The debate on the interest rate so far has been more complex than it should be. Unfortunately, no one is equipped with the knowledge or skills required to make an informed decision. Even we in performance team are having a difficult time grasping the concepts of APR, which are at the heart of the debate. Every number mentioned so far has been arbitrary because it is not based on anything. What we hope to impress upon La Ceiba at large is, first and foremost, that the original 30% figure was completely arbitrary, not based in any fact, and was an incorrect number. It should be discarded wholesale, and should not be considered in the debate as it moves forward. Second, future numbers need to be based on something. 15% is another completely arbitrary figure: The most we could earn on a 15% scheme (2000L under the 6-month, monthly assumption, to be referred to as 6M) is one quarter of the least we could earn on a 500L loan on the old system. This deviation is absolutely unacceptable, and Performance Team feels that the optimal interest rate lies somewhere between the figures.
But, as mentioned, we need to be patient and get someone with expertise. Hugh Connelly is the President of a Bank, which executes many loans: He has knowledge and expertise far exceeding those combined of everyone in La Ceiba. Rather than jump the gun and make a fast decision grounded on nothing but whimsy, let us take our time, consult Hugh, and return with a figure that not only makes sense, but will work in the long term.












